On Sep 28, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Matt Beisser <mjbeis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [shutdown sequence]
> I have tested and verified the shutdown sequence works.
> 
> [manufacturor]
> https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/product/ups/ec350g/ 
> <https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/product/ups/ec350g/>

Thanks.

Note that we do have a few issues covering some of the numbers you are seeing:

https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22CyberPower+%28CPS%29%22
 
<https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:%22CyberPower+(CPS)%22>

In particular, battery.voltage was addressed after your version (2.7.2) was 
released:

https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/142 
<https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/142>

Here is an example of data from 2.7.3:

http://new.networkupstools.org/ddl/Cyber_Power_Systems/EC350G.html 
<http://new.networkupstools.org/ddl/Cyber_Power_Systems/EC350G.html>

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to