Hi Charles, attached there is a patch for a new version of riello drivers: Changes:
- small changes in riello_usb.c and riello_ser that solved
problem with UPS that not support realtime autonomy calculation (and also
internal temperature);
- the second problem I think is related to the first because the
shutdown command that I sent to UPS by NUT monitor works without problems;
Cheers,
Elio Parisi.
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Charles Lepple [mailto:clep...@gmail.com]
Inviato: lunedì 26 febbraio 2018 14:56
A: Elio Parisi <e.par...@riello-ups.com>
Cc: nut-upsdev Nut Developer Mailing List <nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Oggetto: Re: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not powering
off (#530)
On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:58 AM, Elio Parisi <e.par...@riello-ups.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Charles,
> this type of UPS doesn't support realtime autonomy calculation, instead a
> fixed countdown must be used.
>
> How we can fix non supported values?
If a value is not supported, the driver should not publish it with the dstate
API. Dhould the driver be modified to not return battery.charge if the UPS
returns 0xFF? Are there other variables that are affected?
(I don't think the IDG400 is covered in the protocol documentation that the NUT
project received a while back.)
>
> For the point number 2, as we know NUT perfomrs the shutdown after battery
> low signal with a delay of 5 seconds as specified in the FINALDELAY.
> Is this correct?
Right, NUT tells the computer to shut down, but it also typically sends a
shutdown signal to the UPS. Does the IDG400 also respond to the same shutdown
command as others?
riello.diff.gz
Description: riello.diff.gz
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
