During the ISE review of the proposed RFC, the IETF editor has asked for
clarification of the output of command LIST RANGE <upsname> <varname>.
The Developer Guide Chapter 9
https://networkupstools.org/docs/developer-guide.chunked/ar01s09.html "Network
Protocol Information" provides the following example of the output of a LIST
RANGE command:
BEGIN LIST RANGE su700 input.transfer.low
RANGE su700 input.transfer.low "90" "100"
RANGE su700 input.transfer.low "102" "105"
...
END LIST RANGE su700 input.transfer.low
The RANGE entries are not contiguous. There is a gap between "100" and "102". Is
this correct?
Roger
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
