On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 6/26/21 10:26 AM, Roger Price wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, Mark Hansen wrote:
On 6/24/2021 5:48 AM, Roger Price wrote:
Comment: had the command LOGIN been called SETACTIVE, with the
upsmon flag ST_LOGIN changed to ST_ACTIVE, and NUMLOGINS changed to
NUMACTIVE this mechanism would probably be easier to understand.
LOGOUT might be NOTACTIVE.
Current Proposed
LOGIN SETACTIVE
LOGOUT NOTACTIVE
NUMLOGINS NUMACTIVE
ST_LOGIN ST_ACTIVE
What about:
Current Proposed
LOGIN ATTACH
LOGOUT DETACH
NUMLOGINS NUMATTACHED
ST_LOGIN ST_ATTACHED
Better. ATTACH is simpler and clearer than SETACTIVE. Roger
+1 !
Jim, I would like to suggest this as a change to NUT - not something to be done
for the next release, but, like some other things in the draft RFC (I-D), as a
statement of direction for the project.
If the project as a whole can agree on this, I will make the change LOGIN ->
ATTACH in the I-D with a note saying that current practice is to use LOGIN. Do
we need to vote?
Roger
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
