Jim,
I understand you want to help but it looks like neither of us is a programmer. I also 
posted "debug output" from the NUT in my inital e-mail so any programmer should 
be able to tell us what's really wrong.
 
If my assumption is correct, the easiest way to test it would be to replace the 
line 103 in the 
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/drivers/nutdrv_qx_megatec.c 
by
" { "Q1\r", "(215.0 195.0 230.0 014 49.0 22.7 --.- 00000000\r", -1 },"
or by
" { "Q1\r", "(215.0 195.0 230.0 014 49.0 --.- 30.0 00000000\r", -1 },"
and then "run the test". 
 
PS: I am just stupid sysadmin - I can read the code slightly but I cannot write it. I already found a 
solution to my problem (copied some Python code from the internet into big ugly blob - I'm not proud of 
it but it works). I just wanted to report "new" UPS on the market so anybody around the NUT 
project would be able fix/update the code. Honestly - I don't have skills (and time) to "find the 
bug", fix the code,  cross-compile it for MIPS architecture, and then finally upload it to the 
Mikrotik router with OpenWRT firmware, which is used as a cheap & simple UPS monitor for one remote 
AP/HotSpot. I could use 3x more expensive APC UPS but everything is about money.
 
Cheers / S pozdravem
 
Tomáš Thiemel
[email protected]
 
______________________________________________________________
Od: "Jim Klimov" <[email protected]>
Komu: "Tomáš Thiemel" <[email protected]>
Datum: 18.08.2022 19:49
Předmět: Re: [Nut-upsuser] request - nutdrv_qx_megatec.c: update/fix the code for 
"new" UPS

CC: <[email protected]>
I can best suppose so far that for one, printf in shell may differ from that  in C and 
from scanf for that matter. And I think OTOH that scanf can signal an error if the 
formatting string does not match expected pattern. Maybe this is what happens to reject 
the device, maybe some other fault.Try finding where it parses that input to fall back 
treating `-.--` as zero or something to mean "known-mussing"... Ideally just a 
lack of that reading in dstate, in the end - e.g. no temperature field for this device.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 15:24 Tomáš Thiemel <[email protected] 
<[email protected]>> wrote:Hi Jim,
I am afraid that the main problem is in '%.1f' in the "lookup table" when UPS returns 
"--.-" (string) instead of "12.3" (float):


root@OpenWrt:~# printf '%.1f \n' "12.3"
12.3
root@OpenWrt:~# printf '%.1f \n' "--.-"
ash: invalid number '--.-'
0.0


I checked source codes at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/tree/master/drivers 
<https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/tree/master/drivers> and all these protocols have 
similar "lookup table":
- nutdrv_qx_zinto.c
- nutdrv_qx_voltronic-qs.c
- nutdrv_qx_q1.c
- nutdrv_qx_mustek.c
- nutdrv_qx_megatec.c
- nutdrv_qx_megatec-old.c
- nutdrv_qx_mecer.c
- nutdrv_qx_hunnox.c
- nutdrv_qx_bestups.c


BTW - I already wrote some "basic" code in Python using PyUSB to read desired 
data from the UPS, but the communication with it is very very bad. Probably due to the 
bad the quality of the electronics in it. Sometimes it returns data with missing initial 
characters (missing first 8 bytes) so I have to re-read the status, sometimes the 
communication freezes completely so I have to power-cycle the USB port.
 
Best regards / S pozdravem
 
Tomáš Thiemel
[email protected] <[email protected]>
 
______________________________________________________________
> Od: "Jim Klimov" <[email protected] <jimklimov%[email protected]>>
> Komu: "Tomáš Thiemel" <[email protected] <[email protected]>>
> Datum: 16.08.2022 12:44
> Předmět: Re: [Nut-upsuser] request - nutdrv_qx_megatec.c: update/fix the code for 
"new" UPS
>
CC: <[email protected] <[email protected]>>
Ahoj,  Just in case, did you check other subdrivers there? They all are for 
variants of Megatec Qx family, UPS vendors were creative with it...Jim
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 03:46 Tomáš Thiemel via Nut-upsuser 
<[email protected] <[email protected]>> 
wrote:Hi.
I bought new UPS which is not "supported", yet.
 
Brand: Volt Polska
Model: Micro 800
have USB with Megatec protocol ("Q1<cr>")
Data returned by UPS: "(242.9 242.9 242.9 000 50.0 13.3 --.- 00001001"
Problem: data returned by UPS is not handled correctly by nutdrv_qx/megatec driver, 
although the SW from https://www.power-software-download.com/viewpower.html 
<https://www.power-software-download.com/viewpower.html> (JAVA) works fine.
 
"ups.temperature" is defined as "%.1f" in the source code but my UPS returns 
"--.-"


Debug info:
root@patschkav-OpenWrt:~# /lib/nut/nutdrv_qx -DDDDDDDDDD -a ups -x 
protocol=megatec
Network UPS Tools - Generic Q* USB/Serial driver 0.28 (2.7.4)
USB communication driver 0.33
   0.000000     send_to_all: SETINFO driver.parameter.port "auto"
   0.006788     send_to_all: SETINFO driver.parameter.vendorid "0665"
   0.008047     send_to_all: SETINFO driver.parameter.productid "5161"
   0.010655     send_to_all: SETINFO driver.parameter.protocol "megatec"
   0.011858     debug level is '10'
   0.014225     upsdrv_initups...
   0.019924     Checking device (0665/5161) (001/014)
   0.036693     - VendorID: 0665
   0.036788     - ProductID: 5161
   0.036819     - Manufacturer: unknown
   0.036850     - Product:
   0.036881     - Serial Number: unknown
   0.036912     - Bus: 001
   0.036942     - Device release number: 0002
   0.036971     Trying to match device
   0.037069     Device matches
   0.037178     nut_usb_set_altinterface: skipped usb_set_altinterface(udev, 0)
   0.037262     send_to_all: SETINFO ups.vendorid "0665"
   0.037317     send_to_all: SETINFO ups.productid "5161"
   0.037361     Skipping protocol Voltronic 0.06
   0.037399     Skipping protocol Voltronic-QS 0.07
   0.037438     Skipping protocol Voltronic-QS-Hex 0.10
   0.037477     Skipping protocol Mustek 0.07
   0.037514     Skipping protocol Megatec/old 0.07
   0.037551     Skipping protocol BestUPS 0.06
   0.037589     Skipping protocol Mecer 0.07
   0.052692     send: Q1
   0.054678     read: timeout (0)
   0.054842     qx_process_answer: short reply (input.voltage)
   1.465747     send: Q1
   1.494790     read [  0]: (8 bytes) => 28 32 34 30 2e 38 20 32
   1.526803     read [  8]: (8 bytes) => 34 30 2e 38 20 32 34 30
   1.558795     read [ 16]: (8 bytes) => 2e 38 20 30 30 30 20 35
   1.590799     read [ 24]: (8 bytes) => 30 2e 32 20 31 33 2e 33
   1.622797     read [ 32]: (8 bytes) => 20 2d 2d 2e 2d 20 30 30
   1.654819     read [ 40]: (8 bytes) => 30 30 31 30 30 31 0d 00
   1.654919     read: (240.8 240.8 240.8 000 50.2 13.3 --.- 00001001
   1.655052     send_to_all: SETINFO input.voltage "240.8"
   3.061834     send: I
   3.094895     read [  0]: (8 bytes) => 31 0d 00 00 00 00 00 00
   3.094994     read: 1
   3.095100     qx_process_answer: short reply (ups.firmware)
   3.095161     send_to_all: DELINFO input.voltage
   4.506937     send: Q1
   5.509389     read: Operation timed out (-145)
   5.509494     qx_process_answer: short reply (input.voltage)
   5.509541     Skipping protocol Zinto 0.06
   5.509578     Skipping protocol Q1 0.07
   5.509608     Device not supported!
   5.509638     Device not supported!
Can some skilled programmer fix the code in nutdrv_qx_megatec.c, please? I'm 
just stupid sysadmin. :-(Thank you very much. 
Best regards / S pozdravem
 
Tomáš Thiemel
[email protected] <[email protected]>
 
 _______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected] <[email protected]>
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser 
<https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser>
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to