On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Jim Klimov wrote:
Sorry, forgot to update the News entries. And stumbled on terminology: since
this I-D is "from community" and "not an imternet standard", how should I
correctly refer to it? :) Is the following OK?
NUT protocol RFC published at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9271
To be more formal you could even say
UPS management protocol, Informational RFC 9271 published by IETF
at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9271
Better to refer to "UPS" as in the RFC title, since NUT is the implementation.
You could also add in the News that IANA have made the RFC the reference for
port 3493, even though it is not formally an Internet Standard.
Roger
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
