It works, but I got an allergy for CLI

 

PS C:\Program Files (x86)\NUT\bin> .\upsc.exe UPS

device.mfr: Richcomm dry-contact to USB solution

device.model: UPS USB MON V1.4

device.serial: unknown

device.type: ups

driver.debug: 0

driver.flag.allow_killpower: 0

driver.name: richcomm_usb

driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2

driver.parameter.port: auto

driver.parameter.synchronous: auto

driver.state: quiet

driver.version: 2.8.0-2350-g9c6b22e61

driver.version.internal: 0.12

ups.mfr: Richcomm dry-contact to USB solution

ups.model: UPS USB MON V1.4

ups.productid: 1234

ups.serial: unknown

ups.status: OL

ups.vendorid: 0925

 

 

 

 

Da: Jim Klimov <[email protected]> 
Inviato: giovedì 14 settembre 2023 15:21
A: Alessandro Mandelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser <[email protected]>
Oggetto: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Info for decoding report from UPS

 

Ah, I see. My take is that using or adapting something that exists is easier 
than starting from scratch - but to each their own. Surely you'll learn a lot :)

Still, just to clarify: after the NUT v2.8.0 release I began a slow revival of 
old NUT for Windows effort (abandoned a decade ago at 2.6.5-8 based branch), so 
now there are regular native win64 (CLI) builds regularly produced by CI, as a 
tarball of a result of `make install` area (plus the dependency DLLs). They can 
run in-place and do work for testing NUT behaviors on the platform, but are not 
"properly packaged" yet, have no installer, and indeed may need fiddling with 
USB libraries in particular (so that Windows "HID Battery" driver won't get in 
the way and would let libusb handle that node for NUT), but still sounds easier 
to give this a shot before constructing something new. This OS integration bit 
may have worked in that older 2.6.5 codebase, just I had no time to look hard 
at this recently, and nobody else stepped up either. PRs to complete this part 
are welcome, so fiddling would not be needed ;)

 

Quoting from a recent post:

For kicks, you can try starting different drivers from a NUT for Windows build 
- I'd be interested to know if it actually picks up a serial port device (with 
nutdrv_qx as a  first stop, to test for Megatec Qx protocol family). Getting 
USB handled directly may be quite a hassle currently (without a proper elevated 
installer), but may be doable too: 
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1690#issuecomment-1455206002

 

Can try a pre-built tarball from CI https://ci. 
<https://ci.appveyor.com/project/nut-travis/nut/history> 
appveyor.com/project/nut-travis/nut/history

e.g. for currently-latest master-branch build: https://ci. 
<https://ci.appveyor.com/project/nut-travis/nut/builds/48009107/artifacts> 
appveyor.com/project/nut-travis/nut/builds/48009107/artifacts => https://ci. 
<https://ci.appveyor.com/api/buildjobs/kn42sp8aek4md9va/artifacts/NUT-for-Windows-x86_64-SNAPSHOT-2.8.0.725-master.7z>
 
appveyor.com/api/buildjobs/kn42sp8aek4md9va/artifacts/NUT-for-Windows-x86_64-SNAPSHOT-2.8.0.725-master.7z

 

Good luck,

Jim

 

 

 

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:31 PM Alessandro Mandelli <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Yeah, existing packages and libraries don’t work for me, introduce overhead and 
require fiddling well beyond the capabilities of a standard user.

I’d like a native win64 app. 

Anyway, thanks for your help

 

 

Da: Jim Klimov <[email protected] <mailto:jimklimov%[email protected]> > 
Inviato: giovedì 14 settembre 2023 13:17
A: Alessandro Mandelli <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Oggetto: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Info for decoding report from UPS

 

So, do you plan to write some new program for that UPS instead of trying to use 
NUT? (Note there are also regular Windows builds on CI - with some caveats so 
far).

 

I'm commuting now so can't find links easily, but can suggest you to peruse the 
issue/PR tracker, there's a discussion about an SMS Brazil device with links to 
PoC Python "driver" that's relatively straightforward. Or read up NUT drivers, 
nutdrv_qx, blazer, and some others for megatec protocol dialects. NUT website 
should have a protocol library with formal definitions for some of those.

 

But really, not reinventing the wheel (at least, checking if ours does roll) 
might be the faster option ;)

 

Jim

 

 

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 13:07 Alessandro Mandelli <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Thanks. I forgot to mention I am developing in c# for Windows.

Porting or using existing ports seems like an effort with swinging results.

My prototype is working, at least as proof of concept. I’d just like some 
directions to decode the raw reports.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

 

Da: Jim Klimov <[email protected] <mailto:jimklimov%[email protected]> > 
Inviato: giovedì 14 settembre 2023 11:48
A: Alessandro Mandelli <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Oggetto: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Info for decoding report from UPS

 

Seems like recent work on nutdrv_qx subdriver armac (merged to master last 
month) could handle it, or some older QX drivers like richcomm if it is a 
different brew of a loosely similar product. 

 

Try following 
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/wiki/Building-NUT-for-in%E2%80%90place-upgrades-or-non%E2%80%90disruptive-tests
 for example, to check if it would "just work" now?

 

Jim

 

 

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:40 AM Alessandro Mandelli via Nut-upsuser 
<[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi, everybody, I just subscribed, though I’ve been lurking around for some 
time. 

I searched for my question in the archive, but I wasn’t able to find an answer.

Sorry if this question has been asked before.

I am in the process of writing an interfacing software.

After some trial and error, I was able to query the UPS and receive an answer, 
though I am not sure how to decode the report.

The UPS is generic, non branded with VID/PID 0925/1234.

The report is 6 bytes long and raw data look like “0x01 0x04 0x02 0xDE 0xFE 
0xFF”. (The fifth byte changes now and then).

Any help pointing me to the right decoding table would be much appreciated.

 

Cheers

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to