Hello, I haven't change anything in this file. I have another suse 9.3 with ellipse premium 500 and it has the same permissions in:
/etc/hotplug/usb/libhidups Best regards. > Hello, > > 2006/2/3, Peter Selinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > This is a permissions problem; note the "nobody" in: > > > > > /proc/bus/usb/002: > > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Feb 3 12:40 . > > > drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Feb 3 12:40 .. > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43 Feb 3 12:40 001 > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root nobody 52 Feb 3 12:40 002 > > > > This should be the ups user. > > > > eheh, in fact no. SuSE use the "nobody" user, not the "ups, nut or whatever > ups/nut related name". > This point is one of those addressed by the NUT Packaging Standard... > > the problem here seems more to be that the group (nobody) lacks the write > flag (should be -rw-rw-r-- 1 root nobody). What is strange is that the > /etc/hotplug/usb/libhidups already do the a chown root:nobody and chmod 660 > ... > Do you have changed something in this file? > > Arnaud > -- > Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt > Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ > Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ > OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ > _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
