Hi, There is a slight difference between the bcmxcp_usb driver and this ups. If you look at the descriptor it tell you that the protocol is reported on the interface level. The interface level say HID device. If you look at the bcmxcp_usb driver it say vendor protocol on the interface level.
So this should follow the usb hid device rules on the interface. Regards Kjell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnaud Quette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Carlos Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] SOS : Help needed for UPS Centralion Blazer 2000VAUSB Hi Carlos, 2006/4/12, Carlos Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That hardware doesn't have a serial port right? > > I think that UPS could be supported if only one could configure a > "ttyUSB" with that serial-usb converter. > > I (temporarily) have a model with an USB port here, and I would like > to see if I could get it to work with "megatec"/"powermust" without > resorting to some HID/USB magic... > > The protocol used seems to be the same, so the only thing needed is to > configure a emulated serial port. Anyone has any ideas? isn't bcmxcp_usb built on the same idea? iirc, they were just encaps'ing the serial protocol over usb (not sure about hid). Another example of "strange hid approach" is energizerups, but it's hiddev only. Anyway, all this might give you some ideas ;-) Arnaud _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
