On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Peter Selinger wrote: > Denis Hainsworth wrote: > > > > > usb 1-1: usbfs: process 32652 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 > > > before use > > > > so I found two places where supposedly you guys have added code to > > address the above issue I am having. > > Maybe you can tell us what two places you are talking about? -- Peter
sorry for being vague. I meant I saw at least two entries in the newhidups CHANGES file where in 2.0.3preX you guys addressed claim() issues. since I had 2.0.3 I was confused by why i would still be getting the mesage. obviously its a complex interaction of your driver, kernel stuff and aparently somthing from the util-linux package. -denis _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
