On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I made the following devd script..
>
> That's pretty intense, but it's a nice reuse of the udev data.

Hey, machines exist to do work for us, not the other way around ;)

Although IMO a source file that is cleaner could be used instead and 
then the udev & devd scripts can be derived from it.

> If you want, we can create a packaging/FreeBSD directory (or just
> packaging/BSD, if devd is not specific to FreeBSD) to hold the script
> and instructions.
>
> Or how much of this should end up in the port files?

It could all go in the port files trivially.

I think that if the port or NUT generated that file it would be ideal, 
the later is probably better since NUT's list of supported UPSs will 
grow but devd's file format won't change (much).

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to