on 07/02/2011 20:58 Arjen de Korte wrote:
I posted the 'old' and 'new' lines. You might have missed this on the first look, buy after I told you the difference, you could have looked again at the original post.
Of course I saw it, after you made it so plain in such a blunt manner. As I said, others also missed it.
You miss the point entirely. I am giving you code that works, whereas yours does not. Surely a programmers dream.
Not at all. As I already indicated a couple of times, APC uses a myriad of methods to shutdown their UPSes. Have a look at the USB apcupsd code and you'll appreciate how broken the APC software is.
Again, the broken software story.
So bluntly accepting your changes might have fixed you problems, but would at the same time break it again for others. This is the problem we're in (which you don't seem to understand).
No, because you seem unable even to replicate the behaviour of your earlier versions (which I have shown to work after a small modification) in your current versions.
It is beginning to seem as though the current code has become so complex that no one actually understands exactly what it does any more.
As I said before, I am willing to put as much effort into this as is required, but I am not a programmer, so please don't jump down my throat for misreading a sentence.
I'll let you know the results tomorrow. However, it would help if you gave me a patch to the original code so there could be no more misunderstandings.
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
