On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
my fault: the int16_t was a try to limit out-of-range before reaching this. I also noticed it while working on the BB issues, so I'll revert it now.
Arnaud: You beat me to it :-) I just realized I couldn't find int16_t in Rich's patch.
Rich: sorry for the noise - either way, keep 'em coming! We appreciate the contribution.
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
