On 11 August 2012 20:29, Martyn Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/08/2012 20:24, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 11 August 2012 19:14, Arnaud Quette <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2012/8/11 Chris Rees <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11 Aug 2012 13:03, "Martyn Hill" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> (...) >>>> >>>>> My FreeBSD 8 appears to be running/linking against libusb20 - the 'new' >>>>> one... >>>> >>>> We killed the old one a long time ago ;) >>> >>> not sure of what you exactly mean here! >>> libusb 0.1 is still avail in FBSD 9: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=libusb&stype=all >>> >>> Update: while reading the comment on libusb1.0 website [1], I now >>> understand why you're using "2.0"! >>> >>> "FreeBSD 8 and above include a FreeBSD-specific reimplementation of the >>> libusb-1.0 API, so your applications will probably work there too. The >>> source code for this library can be found: >>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libusb/"; >>> >>> but still, your "killing" comment leave me in a doubtful state ;) >>> >> Oops, haha, sorry, that's right; we didn't kill it, just switched >> default, and loads of ports needed modification over it. > > > Do we know how to 'use' the legacy libusb 0.1 in FreeBSD?
As Arnaud pointed out, they're still there; including usb.h uses the libusb 0.1 compat layer. >> Thinking this could be an issue, I have a Raspberry Pi here too, >> running Debian; I'll have a go to see if it makes any difference. I must confess to being totally hopeless with Linux, having not used it properly in a long time. My attempts to run blazer_usb result in inability to detach kernel driver. http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/scratch/blazer-rpi.txt Worth a try though. Chris _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
