On Oct 2, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Tarvo Tiits <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02.10.2014 03:42, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2014, at 5:07 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Why is ups.status empty? >> If I understand the commit log for SVN r3590, then that revision was >> supposed to set the status to OL if the numeric state was 9 for ECO mode. It >> does not appear to do that: >> >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/9cb2de3d9568aa382cc118b4385d97d5664c457b >> >> Is your UPS set to ECO mode? Can you do a snmpget on >> .1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0? >> > UPS is on inverter, not ECO mode, > > snmpget -v1 -c public 192.168.xxx.xxx .1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0 > SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0 = INTEGER: 2 2 also is explicitly mapped to "". I'm wondering if your UPS has a different interpretation. Do you have a MIB file? Also CC'ing Arnaud to see if he has any additional details. He may be interested in a full SNMP walk (please gzip and attach to the message). -- Charles Lepple clepple@gmail _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
