On Jan 30, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Charles Lepple <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Melvin Call <[email protected]> wrote: > >> At this point I unplugged the UPS and plugged it into a different USP port, >> but >> that did not change the above. Figuring this was likely a udev problem, I >> created the following /etc/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules (based on an >> example >> on our database server, and changing the vendor and product id values): > > You may want to rename this from 52- to 62-nut-usbups.rules, which will > prevent it from being masked by an earlier rules file. > > Alternatively, you probably already have a similar file in /lib/udev/rules.d > that can be renamed. I thought there was a Debian bug about this, but here's > the equivalent Ubuntu bug database entry: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1099947 Well, Launchpad says it's http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721600 which describes a slightly different case, but the premise is the same. At any rate, although your later email said that things were working, I suspect that this might be a race condition that might come back later - hence the suggestion to rename still stands. -- Charles Lepple clepple@gmail _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
