Hi Henning, note that I've cc'ed the NUT users list for info.
2015-02-04 13:47 GMT+01:00 Henning Fehrmann <[email protected]>: > Hi Arnaud, > > > the best to process the value would be to have the MIB definition for > > upsAlarmOnBattery, as for example: > > [1] > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/drivers/eaton-mib.c#L108 > > Yea, I looked into netvision-mib.c but I was afraid that patching it > would break more than it helps. We still can try it ...... > > > > > You should request these info to Socomec, or better, ask them to send > the > > updated Netvision MIB (v6) to the project (or /me) for publishing on > NUT > > protocols library: > > [2]http://www.networkupstools.org/ups-protocols.html > > I attach the Netvision MIB I got recently from the Socomec side. > thx. I will publish it along with the 2.7.3 release. in light of this: - it's a kinda-boolean (0/1, ok/not ok) - I've committed the fix https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/4552d14162086a280445efc5331a8e6ad7b1c3a4 > > > > Last question: would you be able to test a patch or a github branch > (i.e. > > needs recompilation)? > > Yes, we can do it and we can grant you access, or both, as you wish. > please be my guest and test the result ;) > > I'm in the process of releasing 2.7.3, so that would be the best to > have > > your patch in and tested... > > We'll watch for new pushes. > > Thank you and cheers, > Henning > cheers, Arno -- NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
