Thanks Charles, Looks like setting LISTEN to 0.0.0.0 did the trick. I use iptables so no worries on the filtering.
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Charles Lepple<mailto:clep...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 8:39 AM To: Daniel Shields<mailto:grungeliza...@hotmail.com> Cc: email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] nut-server service fails to start at boot On Oct 22, 2017, at 2:39 AM, Daniel Shields <grungeliza...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Oct 22 05:57:37 nut.tklapp.com upsd: not listening on 192.168.213.189 > port 3493 > Oct 22 05:57:37 nut.tklapp.com upsd: not listening on 192.168.213.189 > port 3493 > Oct 22 05:57:37 nut.tklapp.com upsd: listening on 127.0.0.1 port 3493 > Oct 22 05:57:37 nut.tklapp.com upsd: no listening interface available > I think you're hitting this race condition: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/393 Using the LISTEN directive to selectively ignore certain interfaces worked a lot better when 1) we didn't have to worry about interfaces being removed and added at runtime and 2) when NUT was guaranteed to start after all of the network interfaces were already up. Can you just use "LISTEN 0.0.0.0"? If there is one particular interface you are excluding, can you handle that with firewall rules?
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nutemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser