On Dec 10, 2017, at 6:10 AM, Roger Price <ro...@rogerprice.org> wrote:
> The nut:nut ownership seems to me to be more natural, and the root:nut 
> ownership looks like a bug in the Debian package.

I would argue it slightly differently: upsd has no need to write to upsd.users 
(or change permissions on that file), so root:nut makes sense to me, but with 
group-read permissions enabled.

Either way, the default permissions are under the packager's control, so I 
would recommend that you file a bug with Debian: 
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting (feel free to mention the bug number here)
Nut-upsuser mailing list

Reply via email to