<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Plucene's index format is currently/still compatible with that of > Lucene's (hm, which version... don't remember off the top of my head), > but may not be for much longer.
not at all convinced about that, if you check out the latest "stable" code from cpan.org it's using the perl "pack/unpack" commands, which thus far, nobody appears to have figured out a way to make read the particular binary number syntax that lucene is using. or something like that :) you can however grab an older version, which is slower, but should be backwards compatible
