I'm confused by this comment:
Doug: "In the future, things shouldn't be resolved until the patch is committed. I just committed this."
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-29#action_61664
I personal understand the life cycle of a issue like this:
- Create an issue. - Assign an issue to a developer (optional) - Resolve a issue as soon someone start to work on this issue - Close the issue as soon the patch is in the sources
Do people see it different? When should issues closed and when resolved?
Stefan
