Hi togehter, I think also strig in JIRA is the better way as there is (in some way, but I do not know how...) a possibility to refere to Subversion if the plugin is integrated later. Probably in JIRA there could be created a new Category or Keyword for "endorsed" plugins. In the wiki, there should only be a notice to the query to get the list of plugins in JIRA. On the other hand, what about a nutch "sandbox" for such plugins? Like at Lucene? I miss really a source code control of unofficial plugins. For example I have to do it on my own for my PowerPoint plugin and it would be nice, if it could be comited somewhere although it is not in the official contribution. Regards, Stephan
________________________________ Von: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mo 23.05.2005 22:00 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: plugins that are not in the subversion yet Stefan Groschupf wrote: > there are a set of plugins in the issue tracking that are not (yet) for > any reasons part of the official sources. > To not lose these plugins I would love to suggest, using the wiki page > 'plugin central' a place to 'store' the plugins, so users can download > and use the plugins without patching and building sources. > http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/PluginCentral We should avoid keeping multiple copies, as they'll get out of sync. An alternative might be to keep these in JIRA, but stored in such a way that a single query can retrieve them all. That way there's only one copy, which makes things easier to manage. Or we could post the patch to the wiki and just add a link to JIRA. Doug
