Hi Doug,
On 12/1/05 1:11 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jérôme Charron wrote: [...] > > What about a site that develops a content system that has urls that end > in .foo, which we would exclude, even though they return html? > > Doug In principle, the mimeType system should give us some guidance on determining the appropriate mimeType for the content, regardless of whether it ends in .foo, .bar or the like. I'm not sure if the mime type registry is there yet, but I know that Jerome was working on a major update that would help in recognizing these types of situations. Of course, efficiency comes into play as well, in terms of now slowing down the fetch/parse, but it would be nice to have a general solution that made use of the information available in parse-plugins.xml to determine the appropriate set of allowed extensions in a URLFilter, if possible. It may be a pipe dream, but I'd say it's worth exploring... Cheers, Chris ______________________________________________ Chris A. Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Staff Member Modeling and Data Management Systems Section (387) Data Management Systems and Technologies Group _________________________________________________ Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 _______________________________________________________ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology.
