Thanks everybody,

I have opened new isuue in JIRA:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-163

Unfortunately I could not find how to attached my
LogFormatter.java to the issue.

Daniel

--- Stefan Groschupf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I also agree and would love to see things changed.
> In general I would love to be able to be able to
> write log files also  
> in custom storages types.
> For example it would be great in case it would be
> possibe to write  
> log files into the ndfs or into a database.
> Especially for smaller scaled horizontal / intranet
> setups having  
> logs in a database would be nice to see what pages
> throw errors.
> 
> I suggest you open a improvement request in the
> nutch jira.
> Stefan
> 
> Am 03.01.2006 um 15:22 schrieb Christopher Burkey:
> 
> > H Daniel,
> >
> >    I agree with you. Using the LogFormatter is a
> bad design and is  
> > causing us problems as well. We use Spring and set
> the error  
> > handler to any objects that want it.
> >
> > Daniel Feinstein wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>  This is my first email to the community. In our
> (rawsugar.com)  
> >> project we integrated multiple lucene indexes and
> a nutch package.  
> >> We use the packages for about two years. Lucene
> is working great  
> >> and we could use it as a "black box".
> Unfortunately, we had to  
> >> modify Nutch package for our usage because of
> some leaks and a  
> >> design problem in LogFormatter class. This fact
> force us to use a  
> >> customized version of Nutch and avoid to update
> versions. At the  
> >> last week we decided to move to the latest
> version of Nutch but  
> >> discovered that the LogFormatter still have the
> same problem  
> >> (leaks I believe has been fixed).
> >>  The problem:
> >> In Nutch project LogFormatter has duplicated
> functionality:
> >> 1) Logger records format and
> >> 2) Severe error handler
> >>  The first usage is standard and usually could be
> overwritten by a  
> >> user of the package by modifying
> logging.properties file.
> >> The second usage is much more problematic because
> it affects the  
> >> behavior of the whole application (not only Nutch
> package). To  
> >> support the error handling LogFormatter enforce
> usage of the  
> >> formatter class by all classes of the whole
> application which uses  
> >> Nutch package. This is done by overwriting all
> the system handlers  
> >> (class java.util.logging.Handler). This operation
> prevents the  
> >> application to use its own log formatter. Also
> this cause  
> >> LogFormatter.hasLoggedSevere() to be sensitive to
> all severe  
> >> records in the big system but not only to
> relevant. More than that  
> >> this flag, LogFormatter.loggedSevere is never
> cleaned what means  
> >> if an application had one, even unrelated severe
> record, tools  
> >> like Fetcher will never run until the application
> will be restarted.
> >>  I would like to suggest the following solutions:
> >> 1) To separate the functionality of log
> formatting and error  
> >> handling or
> >> 2) Change LogFormatter class to be affected only
> by nutch package  
> >> functions
> >>  For my opinion the first solution is much better
> especially if  
> >> error handling will be encapsulated for each
> task. I have found  
> >> the following usages of
> LogFormatter.hasLoggedSevere():
> >> - Fetcher
> >> - URLFilterChecker
> >> - ParseSegment
> >> Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the
> usages above to  
> >> implement this solution that why I suggest the
> second one. The  
> >> attached file is our implementation of
> LogFormatter class which we  
> >> use for more than a year. I hope this change will
> be accepted by  
> >> the community.
> >>  Daniel
> >> _____________________
> >> */Daniel Feinstein/*
> >> Lead Software Engineer
> >> www.rawsugar.com <http://www.rawsugar.com/>
> >>  __________________________
> >>
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>
> >> This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for  
> >> the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review or distribution  
> >> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended  
> >> recipient please contact the sender and delete
> all copies.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Christopher Burkey
> > 513-542-3401
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.openedit.org
> >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to