[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-192?page=comments#action_12364788 ]
Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-192: ---------------------------------------- That's true. In any case I don't wan't to store the class id map. Since if we do that, you are right we can use strings. What you think about having a map in the MapWritable itself where we manually assign id's. This was may plan in very beginning but I was thinking that using WritableName would be better, but of cource I overseen problemes you mentioned. Do you think haveing a static block in the MapwWritable like this, will solve our problems? CACHE.put(LongWritable.class, new Byte(1)); Thanks for taking time to discuss this. > meta data support for CrawlDatum > -------------------------------- > > Key: NUTCH-192 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-192 > Project: Nutch > Type: Improvement > Versions: 0.8-dev > Reporter: Stefan Groschupf > Fix For: 0.8-dev > Attachments: metadata300106.patch, metadata310106.patch > > Supporting meta data in CrawlDatum would help to get a set of new nutch > features realized and makes a lot possible to smaller special focused search > engines. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
