[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-204?page=comments#action_12367520 ] 

Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-204:
----------------------------------------

>There is something I don't understand with this patch. The way Lucene manage 
>multi-valued fields is to have many mono-valued Field objects with the same 
>name. My interrogation, is why not keeping this logic? 

Sure that would be possible. My idea was that we don't need these many 
identically keys, they just eat some bytes we do not really need to transfer 
over the neztwork. 
HitDetails is a writable and in case of multiple searchservers distributed in a 
network it makes sense to minimize the network io since getting details should 
be as fast as possible. 
Would you agree? however I agree there are other ways to realize that, if you 
see space for improvements feel free in any case I really would love to see the 
feature in the sources. 

> multiple field values in HitDetails
> -----------------------------------
>
>          Key: NUTCH-204
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-204
>      Project: Nutch
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: searcher
>     Versions: 0.8-dev
>     Reporter: Stefan Groschupf
>      Fix For: 0.8-dev
>  Attachments: DetailGetValues070206.patch
>
> Improvement as Howie Wang suggested.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-nutch-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to