[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856360#action_12856360
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on NUTCH-808:
-------------------------------------

bq. What do you mean by current implementation? NutchBase?
Indeed. In package o.a.n.storage deals with ORM (though not all classes)

bq. I know that Cascading have various Tape/Sink implementations including 
JDBC, HBase but also SimpleDB. Maybe it would be worth having a look at how 
they do it?
The way cascading does this is to convert Tuples (cascading data structure) to 
HBase/JDBC records. The schema for HBase/JDBC is given as a metadata. Since 
they deal with only tuple -> table row, it is not that difficult. But again, 
cascading does not allow for mapping lists to columns, etc. 

bq. My gut feeling would be to write a custom framework instead of relying on 
DataNucleus and use AVRO if possible. I really think that HBase support is 
urgently needed but am less convinced that we need MySQL in the very short 
term. 
Yeah, the more I think about it, the more I come to terms with custom 
implementation. However, I think we might benefit a lot from the ideas from JDO 
in the long term. Also, JDBC implementation may not be relevant for large scale 
deployments, but it will be a very nice side effect of the ORM layer, which 
will allow easy deployment, which in turn will hopefully bring more users. 

> Evaluate ORM Frameworks which support non-relational column-oriented 
> datastores and RDBMs 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-808
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> We have an ORM layer in the NutchBase branch, which uses Avro Specific 
> Compiler to compile class definitions given in JSON. Before moving on with 
> this, we might benefit from evaluating other frameworks, whether they suit 
> our needs. 
> We want at least the following capabilities:
> - Using POJOs 
> - Able to persist objects to at least HBase, Cassandra, and RDBMs 
> - Able to efficiently serialize objects as task outputs from Hadoop jobs
> - Allow native queries, along with standard queries 
> Any comments, suggestions for other frameworks are welcome.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to