hmmm.. so that means if we want to customize logging
it would be for every plugin potentially?

Perhaps a common logger would atleast make some degree
of sense.

-byron

--- Stefan Groschupf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> That is the sense of the plugin system that each
> plugin can have own  
> libraries and do not share or share them with other
> plugins.
> Stefan
> Am 07.11.2005 um 16:08 schrieb Byron Miller:
> 
> > Is there any way to make sure all plugins/modules
> > reference a standard version of log4j?  seems to
> me
> > there are atlest 3 different versions (although
> minor)
> >
> > # find . | grep log4
> > ./plugins/parse-pdf/log4j-1.2.9.jar
> > ./plugins/parse-pdf/PDFBox-0.7.2-log4j.jar
> > ./plugins/parse-rss/log4j-1.2.6.jar
> > ./plugins/clustering-carrot2/log4j-1.2.11.jar
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Nutch-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers

Reply via email to