Hi,

I've been toying with the following idea, which is an extension of the existing URLFilter mechanism and the concept of a "crawl frontier".

Let's suppose we have several initial seed urls, each with a different subjective quality. We would like to crawl these, and expand the "crawling frontier" using outlinks. However, we don't want to do it uniformly for every initial url, but rather propagate certain "crawling policy" through the expanding trees of linked pages. This "crawling policy" could consist of url filters, scoring methods, etc - basically anything configurable in Nutch could be included in this "policy". Perhaps it could even be the new version of non-static NutchConf ;-)

Then, if a given initial url is a known high-quality source, we would like to apply a "favor" policy, where we e.g. add pages linked from that url, and in doing so we give them a higher score. Recursively, we could apply the same policy for the next generation pages, or perhaps only for pages belonging to the same domain. So, in a sense the original notion of high-quality would cascade down to other linked pages. The important aspect of this to note is that all newly discovered pages would be subject to the same policy - unless we have compelling reasons to switch the policy (from "favor" to "default" or to "distrust"), which at that point would essentially change the shape of the expanding frontier.

If a given initial url is a known spammer, we would like to apply a "distrust" policy for adding pages linked from that url (e.g. adding or not adding, if adding then lowering their score, or applying different score calculation). And recursively we could apply a similar policy of "distrust" to any pages discovered this way. We could also change the policy on the way, if there are compelling reasons to do so. This means that we could follow some high-quality links from low-quality pages, without drilling down the sites which are known to be of low quality.

Special care needs to be taken if the same page is discovered from pages with different policies, I haven't thought about this aspect yet... ;-)

What would be the benefits of such approach?

* the initial page + policy would both control the expanding crawling frontier, and it could be differently defined for different starting pages. I.e. in a single web database we could keep different "collections" or "areas of interest" with differently specified policies. But still we could reap the benefits of a single web db, namely the link information.

* URLFilters could be grouped into several policies, and it would be easy to switch between them, or edit them.

* if the crawl process realizes it ended up on a spam page, it can switch the page policy to "distrust", or the other way around, and stop crawling unwanted content. From now on the pages linked from that page will follow the new policy. In other words, if a crawling frontier reaches pages with known quality problems, it would be easy to change the policy on-the-fly to avoid them or pages linked from them, without resorting to modifications of URLFilters.

Some of the above you can do even now with URLFilters, but any change you do now has global consequences. You may also end up with awfully complicated rules if you try to cover all cases in one rule set.

How to implement it? Surprisingly, I think that it's very simple - just adding a CrawlDatum.policyId field would suffice, assuming we have a means to store and retrieve these policies by ID; and then instantiate it and call appropriate methods whenever we use today the URLFilters and do the score calculations.

Any comments?

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nutch-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers

Reply via email to