On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:34 -0800, Doug Cutting wrote: > Rod Taylor wrote: > > Please don't do that. > > > > bash-2.05b$ ls /bin/bash > > ls: /bin/bash: No such file or directory > > > > bash-2.05b$ uname -a > > FreeBSD home 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #13: Sat Nov 5 > > 00:19:49 EST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOME > > amd64 > > > > bash-2.05b$ ls /bin/*sh > > /bin/csh /bin/sh /bin/tcsh > > Yes, the script would have run before, but it wouldn't have worked > correctly. Now it fails with a clear reason: it requires bash. Perhaps > we should go farther and remove the bash dependency. This change didn't > break anything that wasn't already broken, nor fix anything. It simply > made the failure mode more clear. > > The problem is that for 90% of the maintainers of this script, /bin/sh > is bash, so it is hard to ensure that the use of bash features does not > creep into it. Is installing bash on FreeBSD onerous? It is the
It is installed but the path is /usr/local/bin/bash like any other user installed package would be on FreeBSD. -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
