What kind of hardware are you running on? Your pages per sec ratio seems very low to me.
How big was your crawldb when you started and how big was it at end? What kind of filters and normalizers are you using? -- Sami Siren AJ Chen wrote: > I checked out the code from trunk after Sami committed the change. I > started > out a new crawl db and run several cycles of crawl sequentially on one > linux > server. See below for the real numbers from my test. The performance is > still poor because the crawler still spend too much time in reduce and > update operations. > > #crawl cycle: topN=200000 > 2006-11-17 17:25:27,367 INFO crawl.Generator - Generator: segment: > crawl/segments/20061117172527 > 2006-11-17 17:47:45,837 INFO fetcher.Fetcher - Fetcher: segment: > crawl/segments/20061117172527 > # 8 hours fetching ~200000 pages > 2006-11-18 03:13:31,992 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner - 183644 pages, 5506 > errors, 5.4 pages/s, 1043 kb/s, > # 4 hours doing "reduce" > 2006-11-18 07:30:38,085 INFO crawl.CrawlDb - CrawlDb update: starting > # 4 hours update db > 2006-11-18 11:17:54,000 INFO crawl.CrawlDb - CrawlDb update: done > > #crawl sycle: topN=500,000 pages > 2006-11-18 13:22:51,530 INFO crawl.Generator - Generator: segment: > crawl/segments/20061118132251 > 2006-11-18 14:50:07,006 INFO fetcher.Fetcher - Fetcher: segment: > crawl/segments/20061118132251 > # fetching for 16 hours > 2006-11-19 06:53:34,923 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner - 394343 pages, 19050 > errors, 6.8 pages/s, 1439 kb/s, > # reduce for 11 hours > 2006-11-19 17:49:15,778 INFO crawl.CrawlDb - CrawlDb update: segment: > crawl/segments/20061118132251 > # update db for 10 hours > 2006-11-20 03:55:22,882 INFO crawl.CrawlDb - CrawlDb update: done > > #crawl cycle: topN=600,000 pages > 2006-11-20 08:14:51,463 INFO crawl.Generator - Generator: segment: > crawl/segments/20061120081451 > 2006-11-20 11:31:22,384 INFO fetcher.Fetcher - Fetcher: segment: > crawl/segments/20061120081451 > #fetching for 18 hours > 2006-11-21 06:00:08,504 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner - 410078 pages, 26316 > errors, 6.2 pages/s, 1257 kb/s, > #reduce for 11 hours > 2006-11-21 17:26:38,213 INFO crawl.CrawlDb - CrawlDb update: starting > #update for 13 hours > 2006-11-22 06:25:48,592 INFO crawl.CrawlDb - CrawlDb update: done > > > -AJ > > > On 11/13/06, Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> [ >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-395?page=comments#action_12449292] >> >> >> >> Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-395: >> ----------------------------------------- >> >> +1 - this patch looks good to me - if you could just fix the whitespace >> issues prior to committing, so that it conforms to the coding style ... >> >> > Increase fetching speed >> > ----------------------- >> > >> > Key: NUTCH-395 >> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-395 >> > Project: Nutch >> > Issue Type: Improvement >> > Components: fetcher >> > Affects Versions: 0.9.0, 0.8.1 >> > Reporter: Sami Siren >> > Assigned To: Sami Siren >> > Attachments: nutch-0.8-performance.txt, >> NUTCH-395-trunk-metadata-only-2.patch, >> NUTCH-395-trunk-metadata-only.patch >> > >> > >> > There have been some discussion on nutch mailing lists about fetcher >> being slow, this patch tried to address that. the patch is just a >> quich hack >> and needs some cleaning up, it also currently applies to 0.8 branch and >> not trunk and it has also not been tested in large. What it changes? >> > Metadata - the original metadata uses spellchecking, new version does >> not (a decorator is provided that can do it and it should perhaps be used >> where http headers are handled but in most of the cases the >> functionality is >> not required) >> > Reading/writing various data structures - patch tries to do io more >> efficiently see the patch for details. >> > Initial benchmark: >> > A small benchmark was done to measure the performance of changes with a >> script that basically does the following: >> > -inject a list of urls into a fresh crawldb >> > -create fetchlist (10k urls pointing to local filesystem) >> > -fetch >> > -updatedb >> > original code from 0.8-branch: >> > real 10m51.907s >> > user 10m9.914s >> > sys 0m21.285s >> > after applying the patch >> > real 4m15.313s >> > user 3m42.598s >> > sys 0m18.485s >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> - >> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list Nutch-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
