Hi Andrzej, Ah, yep, you're right. I just did a cursory inspection, and hadn't applied the patch (yet). I didn't notice it was in the main method. Kk, sounds good. I am applying patch now, and will test later this afternoon, fix the whitespace stuff, and then commit.
Thanks! Cheers, Chris On 3/8/07 1:55 PM, "Andrzej Bialecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Mattmann wrote: >> Hi Andrzej, >> >> Yep, +1. I also want to make a small update, where instead of creating a >> new NutchConf object, to just pass it through (maybe via the protocol >> layer?). Does this make sense? >> > > I'm not sure what you mean - the only place where this patch creates a > Configuration object is in File.main(), which is innocuous. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list Nutch-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
