Jérôme Charron wrote:
I really don't like this solution to centralize this kind of informations.
I think, it's the plugin responsability to claim the
content-type/path-suffix it can handle.
However, what happens if more than one plugin claims that it can handle
any given content-type? E.g. html parser may claim that it supports
plaintext. but there is another plugin specifically for plaintext. Which
of them wins?
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Nutch-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general
