What i am saying is NutchBean is not instantiated in the servlet context and
garbage collection.

The Server has a way of allocation NutchBean to users who request from its
base and give it to them .

It must also free the NutchBeans either periodically or when the number of
nutchbeans have reached a size

Raghavendra Prabhu


On 1/6/06, Raghavendra Prabhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No i dont think so
>
> What i am suggesting is we have nutch beans instantiated and we store it .
>
> Whenever an user comes and searches ,he will be given a NutchBean .
>
>
> After he searches he returns it to the pool and during the same time when
> some one searches he would get the same bean (note new bean is not created )
>
> Only if a bean is not available ,does a new bean get created .
>
> This makes it faster as different users share the same NutchBean and it
> does not create a new nutchbean
>
> Note:NutchBean is shared across different users whereas right now it is
> only for a single user and garabage collected
>
> Here we control the NutchBean instantiation and we have to come up with a
> way to free it .
>
>
>
>
> On 1/6/06, Byron Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If i'm not mistaken doesn't the opensearch servlet get
> > around this issue? You could then post process the xml
> > through a stylesheet/css or your favorite scripting
> > language.
> >
> > -byron
> >
> > --- Raghavendra Prabhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Right now
> > >
> > > Whenever an user comes and searches ,a  NutchBean is
> > > created
> > >
> > > We should have a mechanism where this nutchbean is
> > > pooled .I mean is created
> > > and stored so that it can be given to the user
> > >
> > > Immediately after the  user has used the Nutch Bean
> > > ,he returns it back
> > >
> > > (example at orkut ,we get a message saying doughnut
> > > not available)
> > >
> > > This will make search result faster and more
> > > efficient
> > >
> > > Only when paraller users are there will nutchbeans
> > > get created
> > >
> > > Any comments on the above issue
> > >
> > >
> > > Rgds
> > > Prabhu
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to