Hi Yves, Yes, what you got is a "normal" result. This issue is discussed every few months on this list. To my mind, the segment merger is too general. It assumes that the segments are at arbitrary stages of completion and works on this assumption. But, this is not a common case at all. Mostly, people just want to merge finished segments. The algorithm could be much cheaper in this case.
Regards, Arkadi -----Original Message----- From: Yves Petinot [mailto:y...@snooth.com] Sent: Friday, 26 March 2010 6:01 AM To: nutch-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Running out of disk space during segment merger Hi, I was wondering if some people on the list have been facing issues with the segment merge phase, with all the nodes on their hadoop cluster eventually running out of disk space ? The type errors i'm getting looks like this: java.io.IOException: Task: attempt_201003241258_0005_r_000001_0 - The reduce copier failed at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:375) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:158) Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException: Could not find any valid local directory for file:/home/snoothbot/nutch/hadoop_tmp/mapred/local/taskTracker/jobcache/job_201003241258_0005/attempt_201003241258_0005_r_000001_0/output/map_115.out at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator$AllocatorPerContext.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:335) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:124) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$LocalFSMerger.run(ReduceTask.java:2384) FSError: java.io.IOException: No space left on device To give a little background, I'm currrently running this on a 3 node cluster, each node having 500GB drives, which are mostly empty at the beginning of the process (~400 GB available on each node). The replication factor is set to 2 and i did also enable Hadoop block compression. Now, the nutch crawl takes up around 20 GB of disk (with 7 segments to merge, one of them being 9 GB, the others ranging from 1 to 3 GB in size), so intuitively there should be plenty of space available for the merge operation, but we still end up running out of space during the reduce phase (7 reduce tasks). I'm currently trying to increase the number of reduce tasks to limit the resource/disk consumption of any given task, but i'm wondering if someone has experienced this type of issue before and whether there is a better way of approaching it ? For instance would using the multiple output segments option useful in decreasing the amount of temp disk space needed at any given time ? many thanks in advance, -yp