On 3/2/07, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Kubes wrote: > Believe it or not I don't think that meta tags are currently stored. > I looked through the html parsing code and didn't see anywhere that it > could be storing it except in html filters. I see that meta tags are > parsed and passed to the html filters but I didn't see any default > filter that was storing them. > > If there isn't a reason why we shouldn't be storing meta tags, if we > aren't currently storing them (I could be missing where this is > happening :) ), and this is something that people want then I can > create an html filter that will store the meta-tags in the Parse > MetaData.
Yes!! Please that would be nice. Maybe we can do metatag-parse, metatag-index metatag-query?? no?? This way those who want this can turn it on as a plugin?? no??
The reason is simple - space. Storing additional data consumes space, and if someone just occasionally needs this info from one or two pages it's less costly to re-parse the page again.
Oh I see. Now I understand. But I wonder what is the MetaData parser doing really? is it being used anywhere in the crawl-index life cycle at all? Just wondering...
-- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
