Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Sami Siren wrote: >> Emmanuel JOKE wrote: >> ... >>> those files. I tried to look at the code and I think the plugin doesn't >>> manage correctly the dynamic URL with "?" and parameters after the >>> extension of the file. >> >> Yes your observation is correct, the filter compares only on string >> level. It isn't too hard to extends the functionality so it meets your >> requirement. >> > > The question is however what is the intended behavior - should we match > at the whole URL (including URL parameters), or should we match only the > URL up to (and including) path, but excluding any parameters? Currently > we implement the former.
Yes the current behavior (specially in url space) is not what you'd probably expect but it matches the name. -- Sami Siren
