Doğacan Güney wrote:
Good catch! The patch looks good, too - please go ahead. One question:
why did you remove the call to finishFetchItem() around line 505?
Because it seems we already call finishFetchItem in that code path
just before the switch statement. I have opened NUTCH-495 for this, if
I am mistaken, just give me a nudge and I will send an updated patch.
Indeed, you're right - I should've checked with the base version, not
just the patch.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
