You'll probably have better luck with Compass. The Lucene RAMDirectory has poor locking characteristics in a clustered context.
--Orion Kunthar wrote: > > Check LuceneRamDirectory with Terracotta. > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can a part of the index be loaded into RAM? For example, if the index is >> 20gb and I only have 8gb RAM, can I load 7gb of the index into RAM? >> Thanks. >> >> Michael >> >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Alexander Aristov < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Look for a way to put your index into RAM. You create a file system >>> which >>> works with RAM instead of hard disk and when copy your index into it. >>> >>> It might significantly increas performance. >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> On 12/08/2008, Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I was wondering if you have any suggestions for fast serving >>> > of queries with Nutch. I am running Nutch on a machine with 3GB >>> > memory. The total size of my crawl directory is about 800MB. I was >>> > wondering if there is any way to allow nutch to cache its indexes >>> > either partly or wholly in main memory for faster serving of queries. >>> > For some queries, especially after a period of "idleness" I often find >>> > Nutch taking 7-8 seconds to return results for the query. >>> > >>> > Likewise do let me know if there are ways to better utilize main >>> > memory to speed up the indexing process. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Vijay >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards >>> Alexander Aristov >>> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suggestions-for-faster-serving-of-queries-with-Nutch-tp18939420p18957035.html Sent from the Nutch - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
