there is a jira + a discussion on the mailing list on this. This is a
synchronisation problem which has already been reported, patched but not yet
committed. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-719

J.

2009/11/27 MilleBii <mille...@gmail.com>

> My fetch run is getting to the end now I have the following logs towards
> the
> end
>
> 2009-11-27 19:07:43,866 INFO  fetcher.Fetcher - -activeThreads=100,
> spinWaiting=100, fetchQueues.totalSize=12
> 2009-11-27 19:07:44,866 INFO  fetcher.Fetcher - -activeThreads=100,
> spinWaiting=100, fetchQueues.totalSize=12
> 2009-11-27 19:07:45,866 INFO  fetcher.Fetcher - -activeThreads=100,
> spinWaiting=100, fetchQueues.totalSize=12
> 2009-11-27 19:07:46,866 INFO  fetcher.Fetcher - -activeThreads=100,
> spinWaiting=100, fetchQueues.totalSize=12
> 2009-11-27 19:07:47,867 INFO  fetcher.Fetcher - -activeThreads=100,
> spinWaiting=100, fetchQueues.totalSize=12
> 2009-11-27 19:07:47,867 WARN  fetcher.Fetcher - Aborting with 100 hung
> threads.
>
> It was same on previous run, the fetchqueue is not "empty", what does it
> mean ? Looks like there is 'problem'
>
>
> 2009/11/27 Andrzej Bialecki <a...@getopt.org>
>
> > MilleBii wrote:
> >
> >> You mean map/reduce tasks ???
> >>
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >
> >  Being in pseudo-distributed / single node I only have two maps during
> the
> >> fetch phase... so it would be back to the URLs distribution.
> >>
> >
> > Well, yes, but my explanation is still valid. Which unfortunately doesn't
> > change the situation.
> >
> > Next week I will be working on integrating the patches from Julien, and
> if
> > time permits I could perhaps start working on a speed monitoring to lock
> out
> > slow servers.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrzej Bialecki     <><
> >  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
> > [__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> > ___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
> > http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -MilleBii-
>



-- 
DigitalPebble Ltd
http://www.digitalpebble.com

Reply via email to