Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Dan, > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:55:46AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:09:23AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > > Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback > > > > at all. So drop the useless function. > > > > > > Looks good, applied to my for-6.3/misc branch for now. > > > > It seems it didn't make it from your for-6.3/misc branch into the > > mainline (as of v6.4-rc1). What is missing? > > I don't know what was missing, back then, but the symptom stays: This > patch isn't contained in today's next. :-\ > > I found the patch in the nvdimm patchwork > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-nvdimm/patch/[email protected]/), > it was archived. I dared to unarchive it, maybe that helps!?
Apologies! I queued this and then did not advance the branch. You should see it in linux-next shortly.
