Randy, Yes, we would like to avoid straight presentations of drafts and aim to structure the meeting so that we can make meaningful progress towards our milestones.
With this in mind, we propose to structure the agenda as follows: (1) Issues related to the problem statement and framework (1 hour, at least). (2) Control plane / data plane requirements and framework (1 hour) (3) Other drafts For (1) and (2), we would like presenters to summarise the issues raised on the list, and how they propose to address them, followed by an open discussion on these. Regards Matthew On 05/07/2012 13:22, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote: >any chance that > o we can assume folk have either read the drafts or they shut up > o then there is no need to 'present' the drafts, and > o we can have meaningful discussion of the points in question that > have been brought up on the list? > >randy >_______________________________________________ >nvo3 mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
