On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Lizhong Jin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 20, 2012 6:40 AM, "Selvam Ramanathan" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Lizhong & Truman, > > > > Yes i do agree this can be solved by rate limiting at ingress. Some how > we need to bring in > > VNI in to the equation as well. > > > > So should the problem statement capture this as well ? > [Lizhong] Agree, the problem statement should add the bandwidth problem > for NVO3. > > Lizhong > > [Truman] I also agree that the problem statement should capture the bandwidth problem. Glad you brought it up. > > > > Regards, > > Selvam > > ________________________________ > > From: Lizhong Jin [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:44 AM > > To: Selvam Ramanathan > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [nvo3] bandwidth requirements of the tenants in > draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-02.txt > > > > Hi Selvam, > > One of the way to ensure bandwidth requirements is to build non-blocking > datacenter, and do rate-limiting at ingress and egress NVE. Otherwise, I > can not work out another way to ensure bandwidth in an IP network. > > > > Lizhong > > > > > >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> From: Selvam Ramanathan <[email protected]> > >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> Cc: > >> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:40:05 -0400 > >> Subject: [nvo3] bandwidth requirements of the tenants in > draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-02.txt > >> > >> Hi , > >> > >> > >> > >> Should the overlay-problem-statement-02 also talk about the > >> > >> issues arising out of the bandwidth requirements of the tenants ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Selvam > >> > >> >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
