As most of you probably know, a revised version of the problem statement was posted last week. It contains many text changes, most of which were discussed on the list. The main thrust of the text changes was general clarification and removing (or tweaking) wording that was perceived as possibly biasing the problem statement in favor (or against) a particular solution or approach. I believe I have responded to all the comments that were raised on the list, but if I missed anyone's comments, please send me a reminder. There are a couple of notes I need to respond to subsequent to the posting of the document (e.g., from J. Farkos) that I haven't gotten to yet.
Consistent with yesterday's message from the chairs and to make the best use of Tuesday's time slot, it would be helpful if issues with the current version of the document could be raised in advance of the Tuesday session. Also, when raising issues, it would help to be clear whether the issue is fundamental to accepting the document as a WG document, or whether they are comments that should be addressed in the next revision. Thomas (on behalf of all the authors) _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
