Agreed. It is a good idea to do some comparisons
Benson Schliesser <[email protected]> 发件人: [email protected] 2012/08/01 05:00 收件人 joel jaeggli <[email protected]> 抄送 Melinda Shore <[email protected]>, [email protected] 主题 Re: [nvo3] Security framework On 2012-07-31 1:53 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 7/31/12 11:26 AM, Melinda Shore wrote: >> I'm also concerned about the whole "trusted network" thing. I >> think that if you're going to continue to hang onto it (and I'd >> really rather that you did not), you should probably explain in the >> document that one of your starting assumptions is that there >> are no insider threats. > > I'm reasonably certain that assuming the underlying network is trusted > doesn't meet the segmentation requirements of a number of datacenter > applications in either single or multi-tennant deployments. Agreed. But perhaps it might be useful to compare / contrast with existing datacenter networks. For example, how do people think about trust in 802.1q networks or MPLS networks or etc, and how does the NVO3 context differ? Cheers, -Benson _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
