Comments inline Sent from my iPhone
> -----Original Message----- > From: Benson Schliesser [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 5:46 AM > To: John E Drake > Cc: Eric Gray; Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay- > problem-statement-04 > > If adopted, the draft will be renamed draft-ietf-nvo3-... JD: And prior to its adoption, its name would be? > > At this time we are just talking about adoption of a Problem Statement. > We will focus on Requirements separately, per our milestones. JD: The distinction between a problem statement and a set of requirements seems, in retrospect, to be artificial. > > FYI, other text related to the Problem Statement can be contributed > (and incorporated) after adoption, if that text has WG consensus. > > Cheers, > -Benson > > > > On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:33, John E Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Support. However, it would be a graceful gesture for the document to > be renamed to something other than 'draft-narten'. Also, there are > other requirements drafts. What is their disposition? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > >> Of Eric Gray > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:57 AM > >> To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay- > >> problem-statement-04 > >> > >> Support. > >> > >> Note: Several of the authors/co-authors of this draft are on > vacation > >> at least this week and possibly next. I think it's fair to assume > >> that they also support making this draft a WG draft, given that the > >> request to do so came jointly from the draft authors/co-authors... > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > >> Of Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:48 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay- > >> problem-statement-04 > >> > >> All, > >> > >> At the Vancouver IETF, there was considerable support for adopting > >> draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-03 as an NVO3 working > >> group document. However, there was also some support for > >> draft-fang-vpn4dc- problem-statement-01. > >> > >> Therefore, the chairs asked authors from both drafts, with help from > >> Eric Gray, to work together on a common problem statement draft, the > >> result of which is the subject of this adoption poll. > >> > >> If you support adoption of > >> draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement- > >> 04, > >> please reply to this thread with 'support'. > >> > >> If you do not support adoption, please reply to this thread with 'do > >> not support', and state your reasons. > >> > >> This poll will close on Tuesday 28th August 2012. > >> > >> Note that we will be polling for adoption of the NVO3 framework > draft > >> separately. We will start that poll in a separate thread, shortly. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Matthew & Benson > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nvo3 mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nvo3 mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > _______________________________________________ > > nvo3 mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
