Lizhong,

The question of centralized configuration vs distributed protocol driven 
configuration
is an important one - that would include the question of identifier scope (I 
assume
that would be a correct paraphrasing of what you said?).

I am not sure whether the group will pick one or prioritize between the two - 
maybe
there would be a need for both?

The virtual networks in a single data center will be configured and managed 
centrally.
So we should acknowledge that reality.

Somesh



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lizhong 
Jin
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 6:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] performance limitations with virtual switch as the nvo3 end 
point

If we could go with that direction (evolve encap and control plane 
independently), the WG could narrow down to some specific design.
I raised similar question on the list 
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/current/msg00574.html) before, and 
the tenant identifier design is a key point. In current NVO3 framework draft, 
section 3.1.3, the tenant identifier could be globally unique (e.g, VLAN) or 
local vaue (e.g, MPLS). If the tenant identifier is an MPLS label, different 
control plane interoperation will be much more complex, which will make it hard 
to evolve encap and control plane independently.

Lizhong


>
> -----From Martin Casado <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, on 
> Thu, 30 Aug
> 2012 10:14:34 -0700 -----
>
> To:
>
> Somesh Gupta <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> CC:
>
> "smith, erik" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
> "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
> David LE GOFF <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
> "Ayandeh, Siamack" <siamack.
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [nvo3] performance limitations with virtual switch as the nvo3 end point
>
> Absolutely agree.  Encaps will evolve with the problem space, the
> ecosysten of end points, and the deployment environments.
> Cleanly defining the abstractions between encap and control plane
> allow each to evolve independently.
> On Aug 30, 2012 9:37 AM, "Somesh Gupta" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to