Tom, I liked Lucy's formulation of 'concrete applications'. It brings to mind garden sculptures.
Yours irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Thomas Nadeau > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 8:02 AM > To: Lucy yong; Benson Schliesser > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nvo3] Minutes posted from IETF 84 > > > I am not sure calling it an "IT application" narrows things down > any more than an "IP application" does. > > --Tom > > > On 9/7/12 10:36 AM, "Lucy yong" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >It is not to confine the type of applications. It points out a > concrete > >application. Because of debating on L3 and/or L2 overlay, I don't > want > >this statement to make a confusion or bias by saying "IP application". > > > >Certainly it can apply to other applications. The point is to build a > >compute application in a virtual environment that is decoupled from DC > >physical network. This is seen as continually evolution of compute > >virtualization. > > > >Any comment and suggestion on the use case draft? > > > >Lucy > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Thomas Nadeau [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 9:15 AM > >To: Lucy yong; Benson Schliesser > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [nvo3] Minutes posted from IETF 84 > > > > > >Why not just "building applications"? Why are we concerned with what > >type they are? > > > >--Tom > > > > > >From: Lucy yong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >Date: Friday, September 7, 2012 10:03 AM > >To: Benson Schliesser > ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >Subject: Re: [nvo3] Minutes posted from IETF 84 > > > >Hi Benson, > > > >One clarification regarding Use Cases: > >Text: > >NVO3 brings the ability of building IP application in a virtual > >environment. > > > >It should be: > > > >NVO3 brings the capability of building IT applications in a virtual > >environment. > > > >Lucy > >From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Benson Schliesser > >Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:58 PM > >To: NVO3 > >Subject: [nvo3] Minutes posted from IETF 84 > > > >Minutes of the NVO3 meeting at IETF 84 have been posted at > >http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-nvo3. > > > >Many thanks to our note-takers Christian Martin, Martin Vigoureaux, > and > >Sam Aldrin. (And apologies for the delay posting these, which was > >entirely the fault of this chair.) > > > >Please reply to the mailing list ASAP if there are any corrections. > > > >Cheers, > >-Benson & Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
