Kireeti, > > Kireeti, > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> For a number of reasons, including the current "vigorous discussion" on > >> multiple encaps for L2-in-L3, I would STRONGLY URGE the group to not go > >> there. > >> > >> There are more than enough L3-in-L3 encaps already: sufficient unto > >> the day > > > > I certainly agree with you that there are more than enough L3-in-L3 > > encaps that are IETF standard. > > > > But do you think we have a shortage of L2-in-L3 encaps that are > > IETF standards ? > > Not at all! Sadly, there seems to be more interest in coming up > with new encaps than in coming up with a control plane that can > actually deal with the problems of large scale multi-tenant data > centers. However, taking these new encaps as a pragmatic reality, > having a single control plane that can signal across all of them > is a Good Thing. > > Just to be clear, these new encaps are not yet IETF standards (but > it seem s likely that some of them will be.)
I would like the WG chairs (and the appropriate ADs) to comment on what criteria will be used to decide which these encaps be IETF standards. Yakov. _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
