Sounds good, Wim. On 10/16/12 3:56 PM, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Benson, inline > >> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:28:41 -0500 >> From: Benson Schliesser <[email protected]> >> To: Yakov Rekhter <[email protected]> >> cc: [email protected], [email protected], >>[email protected], >> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] >> , >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt as nvo3 WG >>document >> >> >> On 10/12/12 8:23 AM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: >> > The authors of draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt would >> > like to ask nvo3 WG to accept >>draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt >> > as an nvo3 WG document. >> Hi, Yakov. >> >> Can you and/or your co-authors please comment on the following two >> questions: 1. How does the draft apply to our charter and milestones? > >WH> it addresses the following part of the charter: >Support the placement and migration of VMs anywhere within the data >center, without being limited by DC network constraints such as the IP >subnet boundaries of the underlying DC network. >Regarding milestones this is part of the framework for mobility >> 2. >> How does the draft relate to existing WG drafts? >> >WH> it highlights the detailed framework on how we should support >mobility in >NVO3 architecture >> >> Maybe the answers are obvious, but I'd like to see some mailing list >> discussion. It will help Matthew and I determine how we should proceed. >> >> Cheers, >> - -Benson >> >> >> >> ------- End of Forwarded Message >> >> _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
